<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Zextras Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/</link>
            <description>Zextras Community Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>Zimbra to Carbonio migration woes...</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/general-info/zimbra-to-carbonio-migration-woes/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m apparently on the struggle bus to nowheresville in getting my email migrated from Zimbra 8 Community to Carbonio CE.I loaded a new server on Ubuntu 24.04 server, and did the scripted ins...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm apparently on the struggle bus to nowheresville in getting my email migrated from Zimbra 8 Community to Carbonio CE.<br /><br />I loaded a new server on Ubuntu 24.04 server, and did the scripted installation.  I performed the post installation steps, and copied over my accounts and imported them to the new server.  I was able to login without issue.  I changed the port forwarding on my firewall to send to the new server and am able to send and receive emails.<br /><br />That's where my success stops.<br /><br />I have a couple of issues...<br /><br />I can't get letsencrypt to work at all.<br />I have exported my mail from the old server, and cannot get it to load into the new server at all.<br /><br />The letsencrypt log says this:<br /><br />zextras@mail:~$ more  <span style="color:#aaa">removed link</span> <br />2026-06-11 19:03:18,984:DEBUG:certbot._internal.main:certbot version: 2.11.1<br />2026-06-11 19:03:18,985:DEBUG:certbot._internal.main:Location of certbot entry point: /opt/zextras/common/certbot/bin/carbonio-certbot<br />2026-06-11 19:03:18,985:DEBUG:certbot._internal.main:Arguments: []<br />2026-06-11 19:03:18,985:DEBUG:certbot._internal.main:Discovered plugins: PluginsRegistry(PluginEntryPoint#manual,PluginEntryPoint#null,PluginEntryPoint#standalone,PluginEntryPoint#webroot)<br />2026-06-11 19:03:18,993:DEBUG:certbot._internal.log:Root logging level set at 30<br />2026-06-11 19:03:18,993:DEBUG:certbot._internal.display.obj:Notifying user: No certificates found.<br /><br />I'm a bit stumped.  I get the email saying I requested the cert in the zextras inbox.  But that's it.<br /><br />As for importing my inbox...<br /><br />zextras@mail:~$ zmmailbox -z -m name@domain.com -t0 postRestURL -u https://&lt;TARGET&gt; "/?fmt=tgz&amp;resolve=skip"  <span style="color:#aaa">removed link</span>  <br />ERROR: service.FAILURE (system failure: POST failed, status=404 404)<br /><br />For the &lt;TARGET&gt; I have used just the domain, the host and domain, the IP address, localhost, I've tried not using -u at all...I always get the double 404 failure.<br /><br />Again...I'm stuck here.<br /><br />Help please!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>JamesG</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/general-info/zimbra-to-carbonio-migration-woes/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Outbound Webmail Messages Not DKIM Signed - Carbonio CE 4.25.2_ZEXTRAS_202603</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/outbound-webmail-messages-not-dkim-signed-carbonio-ce-4-25-2_zextras_202603/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi everybody!
I will give a brief summary of the situation I had while preparing and proofing my brand new shiny Carbonio CE installation, in preparation for deployment. I have just registe...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody!</p>
<p>I will give a brief summary of the situation I had while preparing and proofing my brand new shiny Carbonio CE installation, in preparation for deployment. I have just registered myself on the Community Forum, so please excuse me if I am posting something already posted here, or posting in in the wrong section. Here is the details (in brief - what an oximoron):</p>
<h2>Product</h2>
<p>Carbonio CE 4.25.2_ZEXTRAS_202603</p>
<h2>Environment</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Carbonio CE 4.25.2</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>OpenDKIM bundled with Carbonio</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Amavis enabled</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>DKIM keys generated using Carbonio tools</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>DNS DKIM records published correctly</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p>Messages sent from the Carbonio Webmail client are not DKIM signed by default, despite OpenDKIM being correctly configured and operational.</p>
<p>The issue appears to be caused by the Postfix Amavis reinjection service (10025) having milters explicitly disabled.</p>
<h2>Symptoms</h2>
<p>Messages sent through Carbonio Webmail:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>SPF passes</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>DKIM signature absent</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>DMARC alignment cannot succeed based on DKIM</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Messages sent through SMTP submission may behave differently depending on the path taken through the mail system.</p>
<h2>Investigation</h2>
<p>OpenDKIM was confirmed operational:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-bash">ss -lntp | grep 8465
</code></pre>
<p>Result:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">127.0.0.1:8465 LISTEN opendkim
</code></pre>
<p>DKIM DNS verification:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-bash">su - zextras -c "/opt/zextras/common/sbin/opendkim-testkey -d einkaufsring.com -s mail -vvv"
</code></pre>
<p>Result:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">key OK
</code></pre>
<p>Global Carbonio configuration:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-bash">carbonio prov gs &lt;server&gt; | grep -i milter
</code></pre>
<p>showed:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">zimbraMtaSmtpdMilters: inet:127.0.0.1:8465
zimbraMtaNonSmtpdMilters: inet:127.0.0.1:8465
</code></pre>
<p>However, the Amavis reinjection service was generated as:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
...
-o smtpd_milters=
...
</code></pre>
<p>which disables all milters on the reinjection path.</p>
<h2>Root Cause</h2>
<p>Mail generated by Carbonio Webmail follows:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">Webmail
  -&gt; Postfix
  -&gt; Amavis
  -&gt; 10025 reinjection
  -&gt; Internet
</code></pre>
<p>Since the 10025 service has:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">-o smtpd_milters=
</code></pre>
<p>OpenDKIM never processes the reinjected message.</p>
<p>As a result, outbound messages leave the system unsigned.</p>
<h2>Workaround</h2>
<p>Modify the Postfix template:</p>
<p>File:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text"> <span style="color:#aaa">removed link</span> 
</code></pre>
<p>Change:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">-o smtpd_milters=
</code></pre>
<p>to:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">-o smtpd_milters=inet:127.0.0.1:8465
</code></pre>
<p>within the 10025 service definition.</p>
<p>Then regenerate configuration:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-bash">su - zextras -c "zmmtactl restart"
</code></pre>
<p>Verification:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-bash">su - zextras -c "postconf -P ':10025/inet/smtpd_milters'"
</code></pre>
<p>Expected:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">:10025/inet/smtpd_milters = inet:127.0.0.1:8465
</code></pre>
<h2>Result After Workaround</h2>
<p>Messages sent from Carbonio Webmail contain valid DKIM signatures.</p>
<p>Gmail reports:</p>
<pre contenteditable="false"><code class="language-text">dkim=pass
spf=pass
</code></pre>
<p>and DKIM-Signature headers are present.</p>
<h2>Expected Behaviour</h2>
<p>Carbonio should DKIM-sign outbound mail generated through its own Webmail interface without requiring manual modification of Postfix templates.</p>
<p>The 10025 Amavis reinjection path should preserve DKIM signing functionality or provide a documented mechanism to enable it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One last note:</p>
<p>The issue was reproduced on a clean Carbonio CE deployment. OpenDKIM, DNS records, and LDAP DKIM configuration were all functioning correctly. The sole change required to restore DKIM signing was enabling milters on the 10025 reinjection service template.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks for your attention, and please let me know if somebody has already hit this wall, or if I could have prevented it altogether.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Silencio</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/outbound-webmail-messages-not-dkim-signed-carbonio-ce-4-25-2_zextras_202603/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title> carbonio-docs-editor &amp; carbonio-storages-ce: missing Meta.prom_port in Consul registration → Prometheus targets permanently DOWN</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/ce-4-5-4-carbonio-docs-editor-carbonio-storages-ce-missing-meta-prom_port-in-consul-registration-%e2%86%92-prometheus-targets-permanently-down/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Fresh single-server Carbonio CE 4.5.4 on Ubuntu 24.04. After`carbonio-bootstrap` + `service-discover setup-wizard` +`pending-setups -a` everything in `pending-setups.d/done`, all services`ac...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh single-server Carbonio CE 4.5.4 on Ubuntu 24.04. After<br />`carbonio-bootstrap` + `service-discover setup-wizard` +<br />`pending-setups -a` everything in `pending-setups.d/done`, all services<br />`active (running)`. However in the built-in Carbonio Prometheus<br />(http://&lt;host&gt;:9090/targets) two jobs are permanently DOWN:<br /><br />job=docs scrapeUrl=http://&lt;public-ip&gt;:/services/docs/editor/cool/getMetrics<br />job=storages scrapeUrl=http://&lt;public-ip&gt;:/metrics<br /><br />Note the empty port — fallback to :80, connection refused.<br /><br />## Root cause<br /><br />In /etc/carbonio/carbonio-prometheus/prometheus.yml the docs/storages<br />jobs build __address__ via this relabel rule:<br /><br />relabel_configs:<br />- source_labels:<br /><br />separator: ":"<br />target_label: __address__<br /><br />So scrape URL = &lt;consul-node-address&gt; + ":" + &lt;Meta.prom_port&gt;.<br /><br />In Consul, the service registration of carbonio-docs-editor and<br />carbonio-storages registered by the corresponding daemons has empty<br />or missing `Meta.prom_port`:<br /><br />$ curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8500/v1/agent/service/carbonio-storages | jq '{Port,Address,Meta}'<br />{"Port": 10000, "Address": "", "Meta": {}}<br /><br />$ curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8500/v1/agent/service/carbonio-docs-editor | jq '{Port,Address,Meta}'<br />{"Port": 10000, "Address": "", "Meta": {"service_id": "3120b478-..."}}<br /><br />For comparison, carbonio-files registers correctly and is UP:<br /><br />$ curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8500/v1/agent/service/carbonio-files | jq '{Port,Address,Meta}'<br />{"Port": 10000, "Address": "", "Meta": {"prom_port": "21500"}}<br /><br />| Service | Meta.prom_port | Prom target |<br />|--------------------------|----------------|-------------|<br />| carbonio-files | "21500" | UP |<br />| carbonio-docs-editor | (missing) | DOWN |<br />| carbonio-storages | (missing) | DOWN |<br /><br />So this is a registration-time omission in `carbonio-docs-editor`<br />25.04.8 and `carbonio-storages-ce` 1.0.16 packages — they don't pass<br />Meta.prom_port the way `carbonio-files-ce` does.<br /><br />## Listener side note<br /><br />Even if Meta.prom_port were set, scrape from the public node address<br />would still fail because:<br /><br />$ ss -tlnp | grep coolwsd<br />LISTEN 127.0.0.1:10000 coolwsd<br /><br />coolwsd binds 127.0.0.1 only. storages daemon binds 127.78.0.3 (mesh).<br />Neither is reachable from &lt;public-ip&gt;:&lt;port&gt;.<br /><br />So a complete fix would need both:<br />1. Meta.prom_port populated in Consul registration<br />2. Either listener exposed on the node IP, OR the relabel rule<br />should use 127.0.0.1 / mesh-IP for these services.<br /><br />## Reproducer<br /><br />apt install carbonio-docs-editor carbonio-docs-connector-ce \<br />carbonio-storages-ce<br /># carbonio-bootstrap + service-discover setup-wizard + pending-setups -a<br />curl -s http://127.0.0.1:9090/api/v1/targets | \<br />jq '.data.activeTargets[] | select(.labels.job=="docs" or .labels.job=="storages")<br />| {job: .labels.job, url: .scrapeUrl, lastError}'<br /><br />## Workaround<br /><br />Exclude `docs` and `storages` from federation match[] / dashboards<br />that consume Carbonio Prometheus. End-user functionality is unaffected<br />(coolwsd is reachable internally; admin webmail can open documents<br />fine), only the metrics are not collectable.<br /><br />## Questions<br /><br />1. Is this a known issue, planned fix in a newer version?<br />2. Should `carbonio-docs-editor` and `carbonio-storages-ce` be<br />registering Meta.prom_port in their service definitions? If so,<br />where is the registration emitted from — service-discover wizard,<br />carbonio-bootstrap, the package postinst, or the daemons themselves?<br />3. Is there a supported way to make these targets scrape-able<br />without editing /etc/carbonio/carbonio-prometheus/prometheus.yml<br />(which would be overwritten on package update)?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>napaster</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/ce-4-5-4-carbonio-docs-editor-carbonio-storages-ce-missing-meta-prom_port-in-consul-registration-%e2%86%92-prometheus-targets-permanently-down/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title> Admin Panel → Storage → Volume Details returns 422 (GetVolumeRequest module=ZxPowerstore)</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/ce-4-5-4-admin-panel-%e2%86%92-storage-%e2%86%92-volume-details-returns-422-getvolumerequest-modulezxpowerstore/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 11:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Fresh Carbonio CE 4.5.4 on Ubuntu 24.04, single-server.Listing volumes in Admin Panel → Storage → Data Volumes works fine(vmail/index1 visible). Clicking on a volume to open Details failswit...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh Carbonio CE 4.5.4 on Ubuntu 24.04, single-server.<br />Listing volumes in Admin Panel → Storage → Data Volumes works fine<br />(vmail/index1 visible). Clicking on a volume to open Details fails<br />with toast "Something went wrong, please try again".<br /><br />DevTools → POST /service/admin/soap/GetVolumeRequest → 422.<br /><br />Request body:<br />{<br />"Body": {<br />"GetVolumeRequest": {<br />"_jsns": "urn:zimbraAdmin",<br />"id": 3,<br />"module": "ZxPowerstore"<br />}<br />},<br />"Header": {<br />"context": {<br />"_jsns": "urn:zimbra",<br />"account": {<br />"_content": "1f5eb839-55fe-4fbf-bc6b-02b987606b93",<br />"by": "name"<br />},<br />"userAgent": { "name": "CarbonioWebClient - Firefox 151.0 (Windows)" }<br />}<br />}<br />}<br /><br />mailbox.log:<br />WARN SoapEngine - unable to construct SOAP context<br />com.zimbra.cs.account.AccountServiceException: no such account:<br />1f5eb839-55fe-4fbf-bc6b-02b987606b93<br />at com.zimbra.soap.ZimbraSoapContext.&lt;init&gt;(ZimbraSoapContext.java:355)<br /><br />Also seen:<br />WARN extensions - unable to find handler for extension: system failure:<br />Extension HTTP handler not found at /metrics/powerstore<br /><br />Same behaviour for every admin account, after full localStorage/cookies<br />wipe and re-login. Reproducible across browsers.<br /><br />Questions:<br />1. Is GetVolumeRequest with module="ZxPowerstore" expected in CE?<br />The module references the Powerstore feature which is Advanced-only.<br />2. Where does the bogus placeholder account ID<br />"1f5eb839-55fe-4fbf-bc6b-02b987606b93" (by="name") come from in<br />the Admin Panel UI?<br />3. Is this fixed in a newer admin-ui release than 4.5.4?<br /><br />Workaround that works: `zmvolume` CLI for all volume management.`</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>napaster</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/ce-4-5-4-admin-panel-%e2%86%92-storage-%e2%86%92-volume-details-returns-422-getvolumerequest-modulezxpowerstore/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Zimbra 9.0 build by Zextras vulnerable to CVE-2025-48700 ?</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/zimbra-ose-9-by-zextras/zimbra-9-0-build-by-zextras-vulnerable-to-cve-2025-48700/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re only some weeks from taking our new Carbonio system into production, now our Security Officer forwards us a mail from the Center for Cybersecurity Belgium with the message that our Zim...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're only some weeks from taking our new Carbonio system into production, now our Security Officer forwards us a mail from the Center for Cybersecurity Belgium with the message that our Zimbra system is found vulnerable to CVE-2025-48700. We currently run the 9.0.0_ZEXTRAS_20220713.FOSS build (and looking forward to take Carbonio into production). My question is whether this FOSS/Zextras build of Zimbra 9.0 is also vulnerable?<br />In previous similar sitations, e.g. in case of CVE-2024-45519, the Zimbra FOSS version was not affected, but I cannot find enough information about the CVE-2025-48700 and FOSS (Zextras) build to confirm/exclude for the current situtation. Can anyone help?<br />Thanks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>cmbzextras</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/zimbra-ose-9-by-zextras/zimbra-9-0-build-by-zextras-vulnerable-to-cve-2025-48700/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Webmail print preview no longer displays sender/recipient email addresses after update</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/feedback-for-zextras/webmail-print-preview-no-longer-displays-sender-recipient-email-addresses-after-update/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 07:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Issue Type: 
Summary: Webmail print preview no longer displays sender/recipient email addresses after update; only display names are printed.
Affected Components: Carbonio CE Webmail ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issue Type: </p>
<p>Summary: Webmail print preview no longer displays sender/recipient email addresses after update; only display names are printed.</p>
<p>Affected Components: Carbonio CE Webmail / Mails UI / Print email feature</p>
<p>Description:<br />After updating Carbonio CE, printing an email from the webmail opens the print preview window, but the generated print view no longer displays the actual sender and recipient email addresses. It only displays the friendly/display names.</p>
<p>This used to work before the update. The issue is reproducible from the webmail print function.</p>
<p>This is problematic for audit/legal traceability because a printed email no longer proves the actual sender or recipient addresses. For example, the print output shows only values such as:</p>
<p>From: Friendly Name<br />To: all</p>
<p>instead of showing the full RFC-style addresses, for example:</p>
<p>From: Friendly Name <a href="mailto:user@example.com">user@example.com</a><br />To: all <a href="mailto:list@example.com">list@example.com</a></p>
<p>Server OS: Debian 24.04</p>
<p>Carbonio Version: CE 26.3.2</p>
<p>Current Behavior:<br />When printing an email from Carbonio Webmail, the print preview/PDF displays only participant display names in the From/To fields. The underlying email addresses are missing from the printed output.</p>
<p>Expected Behavior:<br />The print preview should include the actual email addresses for sender and recipients, ideally in the format:</p>
<p>Display Name <a href="mailto:email@domain">email@domain</a></p>
<p>or should provide an option to include full email addresses in printed emails.</p>
<p>Steps to Reproduce:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>Log in to Carbonio Webmail.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Open any received email where the sender/recipient has both a display name and an email address.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use the webmail print function for that email.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Check the opened print preview window or generated PDF.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Observe that From/To fields show only display names and do not show the actual email addresses.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Additional Technical Note:<br />This appears consistent with a frontend print-template escaping/rendering issue. In the current Carbonio Mails UI print conversation code, the participant header appears to render the address inside literal angle brackets:</p>
<p>Name <a href="mailto:address@example.com">address@example.com</a></p>
<p>If this string is inserted into an HTML print document without escaping the angle brackets themselves, the browser may parse <a href="mailto:address@example.com">address@example.com</a> as an HTML tag and not display it. Escaping the brackets as &lt; and &gt; should preserve the email address visually while keeping the XSS hardening intact.</p>
<p>Suggested fix:<br />Render the participant as:</p>
<p>Display Name &lt;email@domain&gt;</p>
<p>or render the participant fields as text nodes instead of injecting a raw HTML string.</p>
<p>Tagged: @arman @sharif</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>thheo</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/feedback-for-zextras/webmail-print-preview-no-longer-displays-sender-recipient-email-addresses-after-update/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>IOS 26.5, Carbonio CE 26.3.0 - &quot;Carbonio Chats&quot; won&#039;t go past the login window.</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/ios-26-5-carbonio-ce-26-3-0-carbonio-chats-wont-go-past-the-login-window/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[5 days ago I installed Carbonio CE 26.3.0 on a clean Ubuntu 22. Everything started up, all services are running. Email, chats, and video work without issues on PC and Android. However, there...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>5 days ago I installed Carbonio CE 26.3.0 on a clean Ubuntu 22. Everything started up, all services are running. Email, chats, and video work without issues on PC and Android. However, there is a problem with launching the Carbonio Chats app on iOS (updated to the latest version 26.5). It connects to the server, Carbonio Mail works without problems, but Carbonio Chats gets stuck on the 'Login' screen after entering account credentials.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>gedgroup</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/ios-26-5-carbonio-ce-26-3-0-carbonio-chats-wont-go-past-the-login-window/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Internet Calendar Subscription</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/general-info/internet-calendar-subscription/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 14:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi all,
I just migrated from Zimbra to Carbonio. Everything worked smooth.
When I wanted to subscribe to an external ics-calender, I recognized that this feature seems not be implemented i...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I just migrated from Zimbra to Carbonio. Everything worked smooth.</p>
<p>When I wanted to subscribe to an external ics-calender, I recognized that this feature seems not be implemented in the current version 26.3.0. This is a show stopper for me. Therefore my questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>Is this feature not implemented yet?</li>
<li>Are the plans to implement it? Any roadmap?</li>
<li>Are there workarounds (e.g. CLI commands) to have it under the hood without the WebUI?</li>
</ol>
<p>What other alternatives exists to Zimbra in the open source space?</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />Elmar</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Elmar</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/general-info/internet-calendar-subscription/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Signatures that are copied and pasted are sent and appear blank.</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/signatures-that-are-copied-and-pasted-are-sent-and-appear-blank/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[As the title itself says, when sending an email with a copied and pasted signature, it arrives blank. I would like to know why this happens and how to fix it.
This happens on my Carbonio 26...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the title itself says, when sending an email with a copied and pasted signature, it arrives blank. I would like to know why this happens and how to fix it.</p>
<p>This happens on my Carbonio 26.03, but I noticed it on version 25.09 and later; on older versions like 25.06 it works normally, however, i would like to update my carbonio.</p>
<p>I'll attach a description of what's happening.</p>
<p>&lt;a title=&quot;assignature in white&quot; href=&quot; <span style="color:#aaa">removed link</span> " target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; <span style="color:#aaa">removed link</span> </a></p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>oppinus</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/signatures-that-are-copied-and-pasted-are-sent-and-appear-blank/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Copy / Past Image in signature is impossible ...</title>
                        <link>https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/copy-past-image-in-signature-is-impossible/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 07:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
We have a new problem with Carbonio Release 26.3.2 (Network Edition AND Community, same problem)It&#039;s currently impossible to insert an image with basic copy/past into an email signat...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>We have a new problem with Carbonio Release 26.3.2 (Network Edition AND Community, same problem)<br /><br />It's currently impossible to insert an image with basic copy/past into an email signature.<br /><br />The error is:<br />One or more signatures have exceeded the size limit.<br /><br />I deleted all the signatures and created a new one, but the problem persists.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any ideas ?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://community.zextras.com/forum/"></category>                        <dc:creator>mj-oziolab</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.zextras.com/forum/carbonio-general-thread/copy-past-image-in-signature-is-impossible/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		